US Green Guides: Recyclable and Compostable Claims Need Different Evidence
The FTC Green Guides separate evidence for recycling access from evidence for composting performance and availability; a certificate does not answer every claim.
Topic coverage
Compostability is explained here as a defined end-of-life claim tied to managed composting systems rather than a general synonym for biodegradable. The articles distinguish industrial and home composting routes, certification evidence, complete-item requirements and real facility acceptance. Practical coverage includes how compostability differs from biodegradable and recyclable claims, what PLA and other bioplastics can and cannot prove, molded-fiber and bagasse foodservice packaging, and why local infrastructure determines whether a certified item is actually processed.

The FTC Green Guides separate evidence for recycling access from evidence for composting performance and availability; a certificate does not answer every claim.
Article 9 identifies particular compostable formats and conditional national choices, while directing other biodegradable packaging toward material recycling.
Takeaway drinks are no longer a one-cup decision. Paper, PET, PP, reusable cups and fiber lids create different systems for heat, clarity, sealing, condensation, delivery, reuse and end-of-life.
Paper, cellulose film and compostable polymer films can all replace selected plastic laminates—but only when their barrier, sealing, machineability and recovery route fit the exact application.
Serious packaging sourcing begins with the application, not the material name. This buyer-side playbook covers performance, food contact, end-of-life claims, PFAS, sample approval, audits, traceability, change control, MOQ, logistics and…
The same biodegradable resin can break down at very different rates when thickness, crystallinity, additives or processing change. Here is how those variables alter water access, hydrolysis, microbial attack and…
A package can disappear from view without proving that its polymer carbon has mineralized. Learn how disintegration, biodegradation, ecotoxicity and compost quality are tested separately.
Thermoplastic starch is not simply melted starch. Plasticizers, humidity, retrogradation, blend morphology and partner polymers determine whether a starch-based package can actually perform.
PBS is not simply another biodegradable polyester. In PLA, PBAT and ternary blends it can tune ductility, stiffness, crystallization, morphology, thermal behavior and barrier performance—but only when the formulation and…
PBAT is usually fossil-derived yet biodegradable because biodegradability depends on polymer chemistry and environmental conditions, not feedstock origin. Here is what that means for packaging.
Biodegradable packaging does not mean a package disappears quickly in every environment. Its behaviour depends on the finished material, receiving environment, time and evidence behind the claim.
Bagasse is sugarcane-derived fiber used in molded food packaging, but the finished item—not the feedstock name—determines barrier performance, compostability, PFAS status and recovery.
Bioplastics are not one material. This guide separates bio-based feedstock from biodegradability and compares PLA, PHA, PBS, PBAT and starch-based packaging systems.
PLA is a bio-based thermoplastic with several possible end-of-life routes, but the material name alone does not prove compostability, home compostability or local recyclability.
Compostable packaging only works as intended when the complete item, certification route and receiving compost system match. This guide separates industrial and home composting, certification and real facility acceptance.
Biodegradable, compostable and recyclable describe different end-of-life pathways. This guide explains what each term means, what evidence it needs and why local infrastructure matters.